an internet of gibberish
Languages are gibberish, Joycean quirks; they are not anchored to structures. It is only functions and movements that manage to create a bit of polemical order in them.
deleuze, the future of linguistics
i live in a valley between two hills: %%green%%sense%% and %%purple%%nonsense%%. i find myself tending the flock on the hill of %%purple%%nonsense%% more often than that of %%green%%sense%%. it is %%yellow%%sunnier%% and %%red%%warmer%% over here, and there is much more to eat.
speaking/listening, writing/reading, and making/viewing/using are meaning making activities. not everything produced is immediately legible or comprehensible. as a dyslexic, yet voracious, reader, there is plenty of potential for misunderstanding for me. i have to put in extra work to ensure i understand things. but i often learn more from my misunderstandings.
as i was thinking about this, i dreamed about an %%cyan%%internet of gibberish%%. i thought about how fun the markovian parallax denigrate was. i also thought about borges and his library of babel and jonathan basile's playful digital interpretation of it.
i would love some more nonsense out here.
Artaud says that Being, which is nonsense, has teeth.
deleuze, the logic of sense
Tout vrai langage est incompréhensible.
Artaud, ci-gît
if true language is incomprehensible, so should be the true internet. let's make some nonsense, let's have some fun. before we make meaning, everything is gibberish. %%red%%beautiful, wonderful, gibberish%%.
make gibberishy things on purpose, on accident, on your tippy-toes. just put them out (t)here.